When I get together with my extended family, there are certain constants. Absurd amounts of good food, for example (takeout or eating out; my grandma doesn’t cook, never has. She had Thanksgiving catered!). One of the new constants among many of my family members is making fun of me for my use of social media, especially Twitter (@seanathompson).
I’m used to being made fun of for any number of things by my family. My slenderness; my tendency to sunburn at the lake; my ginormous head size (though we all have that curse, not just me!). It’s just something my family does. We all have robust senses of humor. But the mocking of my social media use bothers me a little. Mostly because I wish they got Twitter and other SM the way I do.
I’ve tried to explain Twitter to them. But like most other people who make fun of us social media-ites: they’re usually not too keen on listening. It’s that kind of closed-mindedness that frustrates me.
Of course, this criticism isn’t limited to my family. I’ve heard similar sentiments at work as well. Twitter and SM haters think it’s a waste of time. They think that I and others merely post updates about what kind of sandwich we’re eating. They claim that nobody cares what I or even a celebrity is doing at any given time.
Of course, the only sandwich I will ever tweet about is the Crispy Buffalo Chicken Sandwich from The Vine in Iowa City. Seriously, it’s so addictive, it’s deep-fried crack (courtesy Matt Farrell). But I fundamentally disagree that even pure status updates are insignificant. I for one am interested in what my friends are doing or what celebrities are doing/thinking.
Especially for celebrities and other well-known people, Twitter is a revolutionary tool. Never before has there been a marketing and public relations tool that lets well-known individuals connect directly to their fans and the public at large. There’s fast becoming no need to use the traditional mediums to communicate with consumers/fans/casual observers. Even the media now does much of its reporting using direct tweets from celebrities and other well-known people. While using tweets alone is lazy journalism, it’s certainly valid to use direct-quote tweets as part of one’s reporting.
This form of communication makes fans feel more directly connected to their favorite celebs than ever before. Such use of Twitter is only expanding. Of course, there are those who are now becoming celebrities in their own right because they’ve mastered Twitter and SM and are communicating things that other SM users are interested in consuming.
The other well-propagated myth courtesy of Twitter haters is that the “pointless” status updates are its only use. Nothing could be further from the truth. I started using Twitter as a status updater. Now, I feel like I’m only at the tip of the iceberg in terms of its use for news and information gathering, communicating, networking and professional development.
I get most of my news from Twitter. And no, that doesn’t mean I’m getting 140 chars on each story. If you’re interested in something, you follow the link and read on. Rather than going to 20 separate news sites, I follow 20 news twitter accounts, and get much more information than I would otherwise. It allows everyone to be their own reporter (which for a former reporter like me is quite a nice fix).
And as a former reporter transitioning into the world of public relations, I have learned more about my new profession in a month or two by following fellow PR pros than I could have reading any single book. And so far I’m only reading a fraction of the blogs that I should be and hope to be. I’ve also found free webinars that I know are going to make me a better professional and will benefit my research lab. SM is to thank for that.
The networking comes naturally with the professional development. That’s an element I’m looking forward to taking advantage of more in the near future. I’ve found some awesome and inspiring young gals and guys doing really innovative things, and I want to become a more active participant in the conversation myself.
Ultimately, maybe I can’t convince my family members or anyone the many beneficial and exciting uses for Twitter and other SM. As friend and tweeter extraordinaire Adam Sullivan said (tweeted) to me, “The only people who don’t like Twitter are the ones that don’t get it.” I’m not convinced I fully “get it” yet, but I’m eager and excited to continue learning. I’m utterly convinced that Twitter (or something like it) is the future of media. So you’re only hurting yourself if you’re not at least attempting to get it.
To paraphrase Rick Clancy, the head of social media for Sony “the conversation is happening with or without you.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Couldn't one argue that the SM fanatics are as equally closed minded when they refuse to acknowledge that some people simply dislike SM? Would it not make for better interpersonal relationships if you sent personalized messages instead of bombarding friends (and I use that term loosely, who has 300+ friends?) with updates about day to day activities?
On the other hand I think the type of people who might gravitate towards SM would be people such as the users parents, who could appreciate knowing their child's every waking moment.
While I can see your point for using SM as a means to stay up on news and your industry in PR, before SM ever came along people did that just fine via blogs, websites, television and other web 1.0 technologies.
I fear that as the current generation continues to sit behind a screen isolated to themselves they cheapen and ultimately lose one of the most important things in life, healthy long lasting relationships. Those in the end are infinitely more important then the latest technology fad.
First of all, thank you for reading and commenting!
I would agree that us SM enthusiasts shouldn't hate on nonbelievers who just don't like it. But many hate without even considering what it has to offer, or hate and then secretly use SM anyway. But it's everyone's right to use or not use, I agree. I just feel you do yourself a disservice if you don't, just like you do yourself a disservice if you keep up on some form of news.
SM does allow for interpersonal interation. I think it's more reasonable to post an update and open a discussion rather than email 25 or 50 or 300 people individually. I try to respond whenever people comment on something I say. The convo is the most fun part!
People may have done fine without SM, and maybe they were more industrious than we are, but I don't think so. Just because people survived before doesn't mean we shouldn't use the new tools we have now at our disposal.
I think your last point might be a generational thing. People who use SM don't see it as isolating themselves behind a screen. Exactly the opposite. We see it as expanding our social network in a way that we simply could not do without SM, no matter how many people we tried to network with in person. If you're losing your long-lasting personal relationships because of SM or web use in general, you should lay off. But by in large I don't think that's what's happening.
People trash SM, texting, etc because they say it cheapens communications. I say these "new" forms of communication strengthen our ability to communicate across all forms of communication. You learn to be succinct, you learn to be more social in general, etc.
Good post, Sean —
I definitely understand the frustration over people being closed-minded about social media.
Twitter is so simple that it really becomes whatever the user (and the community of users as a whole) wants (want) it to be. Similarly, to some extent, Facebook makes changes to be compatible with common uses. Social media is delightfully Democratic.
One important thing that you didn't touch on is the idea of niches. People who have a macro approach to twitter don't understand all of the service's benefits. Following only celebrities and national news organizations does little to help somebody feel connected. I think it's important that twitter users pursue a few niches: specific areas of interest they focus on through the users they follow and through the content they tweet about.
Your geographic community is the most obvious niche. @DrDaily, for instance, exclusively follows Eastern Iowans and a handful of UI alumni.
Another easy niche is your professional field. Like you said, you follow lots of PR/media people. That makes you part of the PR/media community and definitely enhances your *social* media experience.
Agreed Sully, on all points. The most democratic thing about Twitter and Facebook are if you don't want to know what's going on in the world and in your friend's lives, you don't have to. Shutting off updates is only a few clicks away!
Totally agree about niches. I'm loving my PR/SM/Media niche. It's a community that I simply wouldn't be a part of without Twitter.
Thanks for reading!
Post a Comment